[Salon] The Administration's New 'War' on Drugs-- Show Me the Evidence!



https://substack.com/home/post/p-176700391
The Administration's New 'War' on Drugs-- Show Me the Evidence!
By Charles A. Ray - October 20, 2025

The Trump administration continues to up the ante on its naval combat operations in the Caribbean against alleged drug-smuggling operations, which administration officials and the president himself claim are carrying fentanyl to the United States.

Since September 2, there have been at least five U.S. strikes on small boats off the coast of Venezuela, killing at least 27 people. Two survivors of an October 16 strike were captured and repatriated to their home countries of Ecuador and Colombia for ‘detention and prosecution’, according to Trump in a Truth Social post on October 18.

So far, the administration has offered no evidence that any of the boats attacked were actually carrying drugs. U.S. officials have claimed that the boats were carrying illicit drugs bound for the U.S., and that they were operated by the Tren de Aragua cartel, which Trump has designated a foreign terrorist group, in an apparent effort to get around the Congressional notification requirement before armed attacks.

Legal experts say that the U.S., despite not being a signatory to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, should ‘act in a manner consistent with its provisions,’ which state that countries should not interfere with vessels operating in international waters. The exceptions are that a country is allowed to seize a vessel that has been chased from its territorial waters to the high seas. While force can be used to stop such vessels, generally it is non-lethal, and the force used must be ‘reasonable and necessary.

Article 2(4) of the UN charter allows countries to use force when under attack and deploying the military in self-defense.

None of that appears to be the case in any of the five attacks so far. In addition, Trump’s armed conflict with drug cartels is centered on Venezuela, which is a minor player in smuggling drugs to the United States, rather than Mexico or Haiti, where most of the organizations actually operate. And none of these boats were being chased from our own territorial waters - and there is no evidence that reasonable force was even contemplated before lethal force was used.

Using the so-called justification that has been offered so far, any boat in international waters, anywhere, can be destroyed and its occupants killed, because they might someday commit a crime in another nation? Have these decision-makers considered for a moment that this could come back to harm Americans at sea?

We know so little about what’s actually going on, other than that people are being killed, and the administration is offering no evidence to fill the information gap, only often wildly inaccurate propaganda. There has been zero hard evidence on the type and quantity of drugs on the boats destroyed. Trump has claimed that each boat destroyed saves 25,000 American lives, a claim that does not make sense when records show that 73,000 people died from drug overdoses between May 2024 and April 2025. If Trump’s claim is valid, the five boat strikes would have saved nearly double the lives lost during that period. Someone needs to do the math and provide some ‘real’ evidence.

Legality and proof of drugs intended for the U.S. aside, another administration action issue that calls this operation into question is the repatriation of the two survivors of one strike to Colombia and Ecuador. If these people were part of Tren de Aragua and engaged in smuggling fentanyl to the U.S., one would think the administration would be parading them before the press at a minimum. Instead, we’re left with more questions, questions made all the more important by Colombian President Gustavo Petro accusing the U.S. of murdering a Colombian fisherman when it attacked one of the boats. Rather than providing evidence that the boat actually was carrying drugs, Trump responded by slashing assistance and imposing new tariffs on Colombia.

As U.S. actions push us closer to open warfare in our backyard, it’s time for Congress to pull up its big boy britches and assert its constitutional authority on executive oversight and the declaration of war.

The first question Congress needs to ask the administration: Show me the evidence!



This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.